Home .Globalization Globalization, war and peace
Globalization, war and peace
Friday, 01 July 2011 05:48

East Asia has certainly benefited greatly from globalization.  Export-led development has created widespread prosperity and massively reduced poverty.  But has it created the basis for a more stable and secure region in a similar way to Europe's development?  Or has it opened up old wounds which still need to be healed? 



These are some of the issues that former Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating took up in his speech to the Evatt Foundation in August 2007, and which he further developed in an interview with "NewMatilda.com".


And these are the very same questions that come to mind when thinking about China's decidedly feisty behavior last year with Japan over the Senkaku Islands, and in more recent months with ASEAN countries in the South China Sea.


Keating starts by recalling an occasion when he was Australia's finance minister some 20 years ago, and when his Japanese counterpart, Kiichi Miyazawa, asked him whether "the Chinese would attack us".  This symbolized the complete lack of mutual understanding and contact between the two great Asian nations.


For Keating, the most dangerous part of the world is North Asia, with the triangle of unresolved tensions between China and Japan, and the Korean peninsular.  The antipathy between China and Japan has only intensified, especially among today's younger generations, since the end of the Second World War in tandem with the rapid development of China.  


The balance of power in the region is also shifting as China is a rising state, while Japan is a declining one due to its shrinking population.  There is now a veritable arms race on either side of the Sea of Japan, not to mention the dangerous games played by North Korea.  The region is potentially a much dangerous than the Middle East for example.


Fundamentally, Keating is most concerned that sufficient efforts are not made through APEC to tackle these tough strategic issues.  He yearns for the days of big ideas and pro-Asian diplomacy when he was prime minister (since his speech, the Australian public has replaced its right wing prime minister, John Howard, with the more Asian-oriented labor party).


But Keating is not just a frustrated former prime minister.  The very same issues of potential instability in Asia have also been taken up recently by the Japan expert and former Economist editor, Bill Emmott, in his book entitled "Rivals: How the power struggle between China, India and Japan will shape our next decade". 


An indication of the state of affairs can be guaged from the following comment by Japanese prime minister Taro Aso to Emmott: "China and India have hated each other for a thousand years.  Why should things be different now?". 


At the end of the Cold War Francis Fukuyama wrote an article entitled the End of History.  Globalization and rapid economic development in East Asia have not seen the end of history, but rather the unfreezing of an unfinished history which hopefully can be played out peacefully. 


At the same time, a new history is developing as economic and political power is shifting to China and India, while the Japanese government has become the least effective in the region.  For Keating, the Chinese government is the competent government in the world, as evidenced by its management of the country's very complex situation.  But the greatest risk that we face from China would come from internal threats to its own stability.    


Asians often take great pride in their informal, polite diplomacy, a lot of which is structured around ASEAN, rather than the regions big players.  But a peaceful future for Asia will require that both Japan and China accommodate each other, and learn to live and work together. 


This will be particularly challenging as China progressively becomes the dominant power in the region, but a "poor power" as the average standard of living remains well below Japan's for many decades.  It is all the more challenging because it is unclear for how long the US security blanket for its Japanese and Korean allies can remain in its current form.  It will have to be re-balanced at some point taking account of the economic security blanket that the US receives from China from purchases of government bonds, and also the fact that the US is tired of far-flung military operations in places like Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, and more recently Libya.  


Under the Obama administration, and thanks to Hilary Clinton's brilliant diplomacy, the US is back in Asia, and is lending support to its many allies, including now Vietnam.  But, this is not a stable situation.  It also seems to be exacerbated by the fact the Chinese People's Liberation Army seems to be playing an independent game from President HU Jintao.  Many nice words are said in the summits and ministerial meetings between China, Japan and Korea, but they do not always translate into concrete reality.


Some 150 years ago, Europe was unable to accommodate a rising Germany.  It then took exhaustion from two world wars, a cold war and US leadership to create a Europe which is both peaceful and prosperous, safe and secure.  This is not the model that East Asia should follow!



"Australia's biggest seat at its biggest table".  Speech by Paul Keating, Evatt Foundation, 23 August, 2007


Paul Keating on China, the US and the End of Statecraft, New Matilda


Rivals: How the power struggle between China, India and Japan will shape our next decade, by Bill Emmott, Allen Lane/Penguin, April 2008


"The End of History?" by Francis Fukuyama



Email Drucken Favoriten Twitter Facebook Myspace blogger google Yahoo

Copyright © 2011 Mr Globalization - Tackling the paradoxes of globalisation. All Rights Reserved.