.Resources
.Search
.Newsletter
developing financial investment oecd foreign countries through can much billion now should time growth years human does between markets poor country global his other world people change international good east economies how crisis china social africa poverty trade asia www state development economic asian europe japan globalization government economy new
OECD and Asia: VIII |
Wednesday, 30 March 2011 04:57 |
Concluding Comments As the OECD enters its second half century, it is very much at a crossroads.
It is an organization which once represented the lion’s share of the world economy, and much of the world’s economic leadership, and could thereby serve its membership effectively. But today, the OECD is an organization that has been substantially bypassed by Asian-led globalization as politics have dominated economics in its choice of new members. Nine of the OECD’s ten new members over the past two decades have been small/medium sized countries from Europe, Latin America and the Middle East. Korea is the one Asian exception.
If the OECD continues down this path, it is condemned to represent a continuously declining share of the world economy. This will greatly compromise its capacity to advise its members on the policy implications of “the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalization” (1), and thereby weaken the Organisation. The OECD’s own leadership recognizes that there is a problem when it argues for a “Quantum Leap” in the quality, the depth and he breadth of relations with Enhanced Engagement partners, namely China, India, Indonesia, Brazil and South Africa.
For the OECD to be more effective and legitimate player in global governance, it needs to make a major and immediate effort to recruit major Asian countries as members, even if it means adopting a more flexible approach to membership criteria and adapting the organisation. The OECD must recognize that the global financial crisis has brought the “Western brand” (which the OECD represents) into serious disrepute. This underlines the argument for greater flexibility with respect to membership criteria. The membership equation has been weighted too much in favour of the existing members which wield the bargaining power of the membership prize, and thereby arguably deter the most interesting potential new members which may not believe that the accession process and the possible policy adjustments that will have to be made, are really worth the effort.
The OECD also needs to undertake a more proactive campaign to explain the benefits of the Organisation to Asia’s emerging economies. They have much to gain from joining the OECD and accepting and committing to the Organisation’s policy standards. As major beneficiaries of globalization, Asia’s leading economies arguably have a responsibility to adopt more of the OECD’s values-based culture in terms of good governance and transparency. Just as importantly Asia can contribute to this organizational culture which has always evolved and needs to evolve further.
1. OECD, “The OECD’s Global Relations Programme 2009-10” – www.oecd.org
REFERENCES
Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. Top 20 Emitting Countries by Total Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions for 2007. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/tre_tp20.html Demographia, Cities in China, Gross Domestic Product per Capita. 2007. http://www.demographia.com/db-chinacitygdp.pdf G20 Leaders’ Statement, the Pittsburgh Summit, September 24-25, 2009. Gurria, Angel. Globalisation: a learning curve. University of Sydney’s International Forum, 8 August 2008. Gurria, A. (2007), ‘Making the World Economy Work Better’, OECD Observer No. 262, July 2007 http://www.oecdobserver.org/news/fullstory.php/aid/2294/Making_the_world_economy_work_better.html Gurria, A. (2009), Message to OECD Forum 2009 – www.oecdforum.org – accessed 8 January 2010. Gurria, Angel, The Shifting Power Equation: Implications for Smaller Countries. Speech at "Avenir Suisse" Foundation Zürich, 6 March, 2007 http://www.oecd.org/document/63/0,3343,en_2649_201185_38377151_1_1_1_1,00.html IMF. World Economic Outlook Update. 7 July 2010. www.imf.org Lombardi, D. and Woods, N. (2008) ‘The politics of influence: An analysis of IMF surveillance’, Review of International Political Economy, 15:5 December 2008: 711-739 Maddison, Angus. Historical Statistics for the World Economy:1 to 2003 AD. Accessed on 6 August 2010 http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/Historical_Statistics/horizontal-file_03-2007.xls Martinez-Diaz, Leonardo and Ngaire Woods, “The G20 – the perils and opportunities of network governance for developing countries. Briefing Paper. Global Economic Governance Programme. November 2009 www.globaleconomicgovernance.org OECD, A General Procedure for Future Accessions (adopted by the Council at its 1155th session of 10-13 May 2007), C(2007)31/FINAL – www.oecd.org – accessed 8 January 2010. OECD, Convention on the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 14th December 1960 – www.oecd.org OECD, Meeting of the Council at Ministerial Level in May 1990, Communique http://www.g7.utoronto.ca/oecd/oecd90.htm OECD, “OECD enlargement and engagement with non-members”, www.oecd.org – accessed 8 January 2010 OECD, Meeting of the Council at Ministerial Level in June 1993 Communiqué http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/oecd/oecd93.htm OECD (2003), “Peer Review: an OECD Tool for Co-operation and Change” -- http://213.253.134.43/oecd/pdfs/browseit/0103083E.PDF OECD Programme for International Student Assessment. 2006 Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/15/13/39725224.pdf OECD. OECD Staff Profile Statistics 2009. C(2010)30 OECD, On-Line Guide to OECD Intergovernmental Activity (accessed 23 September 2010) http://www2.oecd.org/OECDGROUPS2/Bodies/ListByNameView.aspx OECD. Strategic Orientations by the Secretary-General. Meeting of the Council at Ministerial Level, 27-28 May 2010. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/displaydocumentpdf/?cote=c/min(2010)1&doclanguage=en OECD, “The OECD’s Global Relations Programme 2009-10” – www.oecd.org OECD. The Marshall Plan: Lessons Learned for the 21st Century http://www.oecd.org/document/63/0,3343,en_21571361_38695295_41320319_1_1_1_1,00.html Sussangkarn, Chalongphob. The Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization: Origin, Development and Outlook. Asian Development Bank Institute Working Paper. http://www.adbi.org/working-paper/2010/07/13/3938.chiang.mai.initiative.multilateralization/ US Mission to the OECD – www.usoecd.org – accessed 9 January 2010. WTO, International Trade Statistics 2009 – www.wto.org World Bank, World Development Indicators 2010. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators/wdi-2010 Yoon, Bong Joon. The IMF Bailout in Korea: A Socialist Poison http://mises.org/journals/scholar/asia.PDF
Complete Series of Articles
OECD and Asia:I -- World’s Apart in Today’s Globalization http://www.mrglobalization.com/governing-globalisation/306-oecd-and-asiai OECD and Asia: Introduction http://www.mrglobalization.com/governing-globalisation/305-oecd-and-asiaii Asia and the Evolving Logic of OECD Membership http://www.mrglobalization.com/governing-globalisation/304-oecd-and-asia-iii Non-member partnerships with Asia http://www.mrglobalization.com/governing-globalisation/303-oecd-and-asia-iv Why Asia Matters to the OECD http://www.mrglobalization.com/governing-globalisation/302-oecd-and-asia-v Adapting the OECD to Asian-led globalisation http://www.mrglobalization.com/governing-globalisation/301-oecd-and-asia-vi Asia in the OECD http://www.mrglobalization.com/governing-globalisation/300-oecd-and-asia-vii Concluding Comments http://www.mrglobalization.com/governing-globalisation/299-oecd-and-asia-viii
|