.Resources
.Search
.Newsletter
global government china good crisis economy economies developing growth economic asian change globalization east state www development country africa much foreign financial trade asia countries other now new international poverty poor world japan human should how time investment through markets does billion can his social people oecd years europe between
China's foreign aid game |
Sunday, 11 October 2009 08:42 |
At one point in the mid-1990s, China was the world's biggest recipient of development assistance from the developed countries of the OECD. According to the most recent OECD data, in 2006-07, China was still a major recipient of official development assistance (ODA). Things in China are usually a bit different from other countries. And so it is with its development assistance. First, there is no official data, Western scholars are forced to make guesstimates. China's aid is not burdened by ideological, political, economic, social and environmental conditions, nor is it burdened with bureaucratic procedures, in sharp contrast to Western and multilateral donors. This can upset some Western governments, and China is now responding to pressure to encourage more ethical and responsible behaviour in countries like the Sudan. China does not have a central aid agency. Its aid is mainly administered by its Ministry of Commerce, and to a lesser extent the Export-Import Bank of China, the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This is not necessarily a bad thing. One problem that OECD countries have, despite having dedicated aid agencies, is that their development co-operation policies are often inconsistent with their trade, agriculture, environment, technology and other policies. A single agency does not guarantee policy coherence. China often promotes economic projects in countries, areas and sectors that Western governments and corporations have avoided for being too difficult and unfriendly. Many of China's public works projects in foreign countries are cultural centres, stadiums and highways, which are launched with great fanfare, symbolising friendship between China and the country in question. In Chinese culture, it is important to establish friendship as a precondition for doing business. Over the period 2002-2007, 44% of aid was allocated to Africa, 36% to Latin America nd 20% to Southeast Asia. Aid activities in Africa and Latin America serve China's economic interests, while aid to Southeast Asia has more diplomatic or strategic objectives. In Africa and Southeast Asia, Chinese infrastructure and public works projects are the most common form of aid. In Latin America, China-sponsored resource development activities are more prominent. In the past few years, China has become a major financier and investor in infrastructure, energy, agriculture and mining in the Philippines. In 2006, China was reportedly the 3rd largest source of bilateral development assistance to the Philippines, after Japan and the UK. What does all this mean? In short, China is now matching its economic power with diplomatic and soft power. Some argue that it is clearly outplaying the US diplomacy (with its cowboy unilateralism, despite Obama) and also Japanese diplomacy, which is invariably culturally tone deaf and has appalling linguistic capabilities. There is one thing which will always limit the success of China's efforts. It is too big and powerful to be trusted. But that is wrong. China has too many things to worry about at home, to be interested in expansionism. And as the US and Japan have shown in the post-war period, foreign investment is the best form of de facto colonialism. Congressional Research Service, February 2009
www.oecd.org
|